Great books seldom make movies as great as John Huston's version of Dashiell Hammett's The Maltese Falcon. They're even more rarely true to the book and and its larger than life female characters. Hammett's Brigid O’Shaughnessy displays all the necessary qualifications for a classic old school heroine. She’s twenty-three, possessed of porcelain skin and big blue eyes, and prefers to talk in a breathy, girlish voice. Mary Astor was ten years older than the literary Brigid when she played the role, but everything else about her portrayal comes straight from Hammett.
I’m watching her now.
Our classic old school heroine just kneed a guy in the nuts less than
two minutes after pistol whipping him.
Welcome to the world of real
old school heroines. Brigid might have
been the ultimate bad girl, but Dashiell Hammet didn’t write wimpy women. Even good girls like Nora Charles could handle whatever the plot dished out. As one of The Thin Man's gunsels pointed out, she was a woman with hair on her chest. But what would you expect from a man who's life partner was Lillian Hellman?
Shakespeare wrote some notable drips (Ophelia, anyone? To say nothing of Juliet, the original Little
Miss Too Stupid To Live). But he also
gave us Viola and Beatrice, who famously yearned to a certain cad’s heart in
the marketplace. And they were Shakespeare’s
good girls.
Homer gave us Penelope.
The Arabian Nights gave us Scheherazade. You can’t get much more old school than that.
My point is, you can’t equate “old school heroine” with weak
or ineffectual. You can’t even use those
words to describe virginal heroines.
Elizabeth Bennett is unquestionably a virgin, but no one could question
her tough-mindedness. No one could say
she lacks agency.
Most of the weak-minded lack of agency we associate with old
school heroines was in fact a product of mid-twentieth century genre publishing
tropes, specifically the belief of certain publishing executives that the women who helped win World War II didn't want to read about women as multi-faceted and capable as they were.
It would be tempting to blame this view on the 1950s' desperate search for normalcy amid the Red Scare and very real fears of nuclear annihilation. After all, this is the era which gave us the insulting neuroses and emotional fragility
of Doris Day’s portrayal of Jo McKenna in the 1956 version of The Man Who Knew Too Much. But three years earlier, in Otto Preminger’s The Moon Is Blue, Maggie MacNamara
played good girl Patty O’Neill—a girl who states right up front that she’s a
virgin and plans to stay that way—as a smart professional woman who confounds dedicated playboys William Holden and David Niven. Not only that, she does it dressed like an
old school Barbie—tiny waist, pony tail, Mamie Eisenhower bangs and all.
In fact, the attitudes of publishing executives on the
subject of “acceptable” heroines lagged far behind what was happening in American
and European society, especially as the Seventies gave way to the
Eighties. In Reflections on the Magic of Writing, a new compilation of Diana
Wynne Jones’s essays and lectures, Jones writes about how she had to “sneak” a strong
female hero into Dogsbody by telling
it from the dog’s point of view. It took
her years to work up to writing Polly in Fire
and Hemlock and (my personal favorite) Sophie in Howl’s Moving Castle.
If one of the most well-respected literary fantasy writers
of the late 20th century had to tread carefully in her fictional depictions of
girls and women, imagine what it was like trying to work in the hothouse
environment of series romance. Yet
series romance writers, as much as Jones and romantic mystery writers like
Barbara Michaels/Elizabeth Peters, were working to change perceptions of women
and women characters from the inside out.
Personally, I’m thrilled the most insulting aspects of
mid-century romance heroines have gone out of literary fashion. I like reading books that reflect the
realities of my life as a woman, about heroines who can kick a guy in the nuts
for lying and still qualify for an HEA.
But that doesn’t mean the realities of my life are the only valid
realities out there.
As far as I’m concerned there’s still room for old school
good girls. After all, there’s a lot to
be said for women who triumph over the constraints of their circumstances like Beatrice and
Elizabeth Bennett, Scheherazade and Patty O’Neill.
To say nothing of Sophie.
Jean Marie Ward
(And if you want to read more about Reflections on the Magic of Writing—and how could you not?—I strongly recommend Ana’s review at Things Mean A Lot.)
4 comments:
Good points, all. The more I think about it, over the last couple years, the more I've come to realize that the collective hallucination of the last seventy-five years as brought about by television and bad institutional education is nothing more than a shielding and shading of reality. The more I learn about history the more I realize what I was taught as history is a paltry reflection of it that has little in common with the actual events.
I wish I could remember the author but there's a woman writing a story about, I think, someone who lived during the time of Lincoln, and darned if I can't remember the name or attribution. What stuck in my mind was her comment, paraphrased here, "What interested me were the great silences in history." She was writing about the women behind important events and that phrase intrigued me. I look forward to the literary work and scholarship of the next decade as we collectively wake up from what seems to me to be a several decades long sleep and realize there's more to us women than we realized.
Or, maybe I'll just have some more coffee. ~grin~ Thank you for a lovely post! Very thought-provoking. AND it added to my TBR pile. ~glares~
Hammett and Wynne Jones are amazing. Hammett reads like poetry--and breaks every rule in Margie Lawson's book. (I suspect she's much more of a Raymond Chandler fan.) As for Wynne Jones--HOWL'S MOVING CASTLE. 'Nuff said. :D
Great post, Jean Marie. You are such a smart woman!
Thanks, Kimberley. I only wish I was.
Post a Comment